Reasons To Disagree
I DISAGREE ON GROUNDS THAT A SOLUTION IS ABSENT IN THIS AS WELL. THIS IS AN IDEAL. HOW WOULD YOU PURPOSE THAT TO HAPPEN? well.....thats alot of power for three people...like Abraham licoln once said, "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." not saying im distrusting of the administration its just better to be safe then sorry. as already stated should have more people to give more options If there is one unusual being of prowess and mental power, why not let that one lead us all. Always 12.Never less or more. how the Jedi council of old
The Council was made up of five lifetime members, four long-term members, and three limited-term members the council should remain 12 This number is far too small when deciding matters for thousands. 12 members are sufficient, as the Ascended Master Jedi Jesus had 12. This was viewd as enough to change the history of this world via the teachings of the Christ. location and and number represented for the issue should matter, but otherwise a minimum of 6 for any small issue or 12 for a larger issue If we were able to establish one true leader, they could become both a figure head, and a master to all those unfamiliar with the ways of the force. And it is impossible to disguise impurity in the eyes of so many. If the leader is too weak, he/she shall be replaced with a purer candidate. not enough It should be on an rotational way from the member council. Eleven is a good workable group size. The only valid reason for allowing the council to be less would be if there are fewer than 11 Jedi remaining in existence. Ciuncil should have a set number. the number should be based on numbers in the church and in regions A Quorum hould be at least 7 for any major decisions. Urgent or on the spot decisions for local reasons may be fewer but a minimum of three. Learn to trust the wisdom within. 12 is much better. It allows more minds to be involved and gives time to allow a matter to be dicussed and better resolved. This would not voice enough opinions. 12 is greater then 3, you get more views with 12 members. Scrap the board decisions should be made like this Well....No. It should have about 10. there should be no adminastrative board no1 has the right to be above any1 3 is too small, the smallest number in the
power group should be 9 or 11. i think more than 3 5 You need more than three to get anything done. Five should be a minimum, seven is better, anything more than 11 becomes more challenging. Perhaps 12 we should have, if there are never less nor more than 2 Sith agents, a Sith Lord and Sith Padawan then perhaps we should seek more Jedi Masters.
kiz there should only be one. Gary 'The God King' McF i say at least 6 for there are to many members and force use for 3 ppl to handle As with to many members to few will also cause trouble in the long run of things 5? is better more the merryer There should be 13 at all times. 13 is an odd number, therefore there can be no ties, and it is neither too high or too low, so there is enough room for various opinions.
|
|
Reasons To Agree
I agree, if less then 3 members are in power, who will keep those 3 people in line? 3 is a good number. one to agree, one to disagree and one to confuse both sides i think 3 because "3 is a good number. one to agree, one to disagree and one to confuse both sides" - not my words. is a very good statement!
it needs more but never less than three Such power can become a burden to one single jedi, or even two. this is a path that would certainly lead to the dark side of the force. If you had fewer than it could get nasty. Too much power in the hands of too few would be disastrous. To be fair, I think that a representative system should be worked out in order to decide what is best for all Jedi. A local chapter should have no less than 3. The grand council should have 13. anything under 3 is not good for decision making - yet 3 is also way too small - if 3 is reached - everything should be done to bring it back up to 12. We need more than three people one or two is not democrocy now is it IF LESS THAN 12 THEN NO VOTE CAN TAKE PLACE. no ties and the agreement of at least two masters agree there needs to be far more, Or the individual Ministries will not be very well represented There should be 12 but The Jedi Administrative board can function temporarily with only 3 members guided by the Force.
If you are getting les then 3 you are starting to look at the posibility of absolute power which leads to the dark side Those that have power will be unwilling to let go of that power and lead them to the dark side. More is better
While I was neutral on the subject of having no more than 12 members, having any less than 3 will only put the Jedi at risk, as it would be harder to stop any forms of corruption into the sith. No less then 3, better 5. Yes by having three it allows them to keep each other in line- one would result in him/her being consumed by self importance and eventually power,and if by havin two the more in charge would be able to persuade the second more easily than if there were three. Therefore 3 is a good number as they can support the other members of the administrative board so that no bad decisions are made or anyone is consumed by power etc. If there were 2 you open yourself to a splitting of opinion that could result in a splitting of the Order. If there was one, you would be inviting a dictatorship. Um three is once again i stated is fine um u don't need a ton of members to answer one issue it only takes a few always than that we wouldn't get any where now would we? So i prefer a mid range such as 5 or 7 but three is fine There should be 12 This idea can stop dictatorship within the ministeries of the Jedi church. A representative system should be in place to ensure that there is not too much power in the hands of too few. 12 is a good number. i also believe that for every decision two people should be appointed, one for each side before the counsel is made aware of the question. that way all members should have an unbiased view of all sides, or at least strive for one. Administrative responsibilities can be a heavy burden on 1 or 2 people. VERY minimum. Personally I believe no less and no more than 12 at any one time. 11 or 13, multi-national.
Increases chance of differing views, but makes ties impossible. Some consider Paul to be the thirtheen Apostle and Jesus gave him and Peter a vision of this addition and what about Jesus himself wouldn't that make 14. I beleive a number of members should evolve with the growing numbers of the Order. A council member for so many members in the Order. But definitely never less than 7 that is an uneven number to help keep balance a center piece of heavy decision making when the Order is low in Numbers. Only in an emergency should the council ever get down to three members and should never go below that. Remember that the Sith were a rule of 2, a master and aprentice and the size was to hide their actions....we have nothing to hide and should act and be a size accourding. Yes The mass is easily swayed by popular opinion, and non Jedi ethics, however no individual Jedi should be place in a such a position of potential corruption. 3 members for over like 20000 people!
i think we need more There must be proper representation of all members regardless. Three seems too small a number in the best of times Always necessary for a quorum. The BALANCE is well 13 is the Numeber We need atleast three to have a group disscussion in the board protecting public intrest. There are now three main views to be seen, dissagree, agree, and neutrality. The inclusion of 3+ members without the chatter of more than 12 allows the important matters to be disscused thoroughly, voted apon, and completed in a subjective manner. One person is more likely to serve himself, two are unlikely to complete a task with similar risks. One of sword, one of might, one of sight and one of knowledge. Compassion, love, wisdom, enlightenment. It's an absurd concept to even think of it as a "board" if there are less than 3 members on it. How is this even a question? we must not allow this order to become a dictatorship Important decisions should not fall upon so few. Obvously! The rule of 2... We could become sith! actually it should be no fewer than 10 but never a number that can divide equally without 1 extra (example 9 can be split equally 3 times were as 13 cannot.) 13
The Council of Twelve
Grand Master. Simple as. 31 is the way for The Jedi Administrative to be.
|
