Muhammad was a prophet?
On average, everyone disagrees with nonconsensus between 188 voters.
Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Muhammad was a prophet
Reasons To Disagree
He didn't exist. He is a character from a fictional book.
9 February 2012
The deities of Judaism, Christianity and Islam were most likely ancient aliens.
11 February 2012
He was a boxer
25 February 2012
Try filling out 'Jedi' in an Islamic Census.If you were born to a Muslim father that would make you an apostate thus 'deserving' of the death penalty.
31 July 2012
I don't believe in Muhammed
28 November 2012
Same as Moses and Jesus.
5 January 2013
The existence of a conscious god is ridiculously thin so prophet too.
23 April 2014
in an archaic religion, yes. but that is not what i beleive
21 November 2014
There are no prophets only people who do things
27 June 2015
Based on the actions of many of his followers he was definitely on the Dark Side
5 August 2015
It was a fabrication from the Christian church
14 December 2015
He was a man like any other man.
2 August 2016
Just a man kinda a terrorist if you read about him
11 November 2017
Reasons To Agree
Muhammad sought to correct what was as he called gone astray. This is why the bible and holy qu'ran coincide with eachother. They teach just about the same thing. If you haven't read the both of them then you would not know this. Muslims once followed the bile itself before the holy qu'ran was revealed through the use of telepathy. This is why he went crazy!
5 March 2011
MUHAMMAD WAS A JEDI, ALSO JEDI HAVE BEEN AROUND FOR CENTURIES WHAT WE NOW CALL A JEDI HAS LITTLE MEANING TO HOW THE FORCE WILLS US AND I BELIEVE THAT A JEDI IS A POLITICALLY CORRECT WAY SAYING A FOLLOWER OF ONE
24 March 2011
I believe so
20 May 2011
jesus prophesied muhammad would succeed him but after muhammad and his followers are gone they would be corrupted by the sith
13 December 2012
every religion has parts of the truth. if you have many different pleople saying the same thing, most likely what they are saying is the truth. if another religion is saying something that agrees with something another religion is saying it should not be dismissed because "its not the jedi way" it should be studied and imbraced so it might lead the jedi to new light and understanding
1 January 2015
Reasons for Remain Neutral
To zealots of Islam yes.
I dont understand the question. Of Islam? Yes. Of Jedi Church? No. Why is this in here???
Not of the Force. Of some other religion, sure.
Muhammad was an open-minded as well as Abraham. He was a trial before Jesus, but his message was misunderstood by most of his followers. Some of them turned to the dark side instead of increase the goodness and living values.
He was not a Jedi. He was Islamic. It is not the same thing. The prophets are not the same.
He might have been a prophet but he was not a jedi.
probably but since he was alive sevral thousand years ago and ive never spoken to him i have no way of knowing
he may have been, but any followers preaching violence are subject to question
Same, as Jesus. He could either be a man who tried to spread his message across about religion or was a messenger.
I do not know enough to really say... But, as with the others, he had some wisdom worth listening to. It does not matter to me whether he was a prophet or not - I am not Muslim.
My comment remains the same. We are all prophets if we understand the cyclical propertues of the universe.
He was a character in a story where he was portrayed as a prophet
not my concern
Whether or not he is real is of no consequence, the teachings are the important part. But I remain neutral because said teachings are open for interpretation and based upon the individuals person views. And those views are valid as long as they dont diminish anothers quality of life or their value.
You can make your comments once you have voted.