Possessing a weapon is a reasonable deterrent to a tyrannical government?
On average, everyone strongly agrees with consensus between 15 voters.
Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Possessing a weapon is a reasonable deterrent to a tyrannical government
Reasons To DisagreeNo reasons have yet been given to disagree with this statement
Reasons To Agree
Any government that has overtaken their people had to disarm them first.
27 November 2018
First this question should have been worded more like this. Possessing arms (as in baseball bats, swords or guns)is a reasonable deterrent to a tyrannical government? Yes the people should have arms always. Because the government should be afraid of the people. The people should never be afraid of the government.
29 November 2018
The government is less likely to talk your rights away if we were all armed.
4 May 2020
Reasons for Remain Neutral
It may be helpful, but a single owner of a weapon without the structure of well-trained militant group is useless. If it is not asked, however- for self-defense purposes it is reasonable to carry a weapon as a deterrent.
You can make your comments once you have voted.