Join our facebook group

Possessing a weapon is a reasonable deterrent to a tyrannical government?

 


On average, everyone strongly agrees with consensus between 11 voters.

Disagree
 
Agree

Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Possessing a weapon is a reasonable deterrent to a tyrannical government

You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.


Reasons To Disagree

No reasons have yet been given to disagree with this statement
 

Reasons To Agree

Any government that has overtaken their people had to disarm them first.

27 November 2018

First this question should have been worded more like this. Possessing arms (as in baseball bats, swords or guns)is a reasonable deterrent to a tyrannical government? Yes the people should have arms always. Because the government should be afraid of the people. The people should never be afraid of the government.

29 November 2018

Reasons for Remain Neutral

It may be helpful, but a single owner of a weapon without the structure of well-trained militant group is useless. If it is not asked, however- for self-defense purposes it is reasonable to carry a weapon as a deterrent.

27 November 2018

My View

You can make your comments once you have voted.

You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.

Back to all voting categories or
Back to "Weapons"

 

or join our facebook group